Tshwane’s ‘unlawful’ reappointment of airport managers threatens to ground Wonderboom

Please log in or register to like posts.

reeling from a damning R5bn irregular expenditure finding from the Auditor General,
the City of Tshwane has reappointed a service provider to run the Wonderboom
National Airport (WNA) in spite of warnings by its legal and supply chain management
departments that the appointment could be unlawful.

But the City says the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA) will shut down the airport without a manager, and it
could not appoint someone internally to do the job.

“The airport manager
position was not filled due to an incorrect and non-compliant job specification
and minimum qualifications required,” the City’s roads and transport
department argued in support of the reappointment of a private airport
management company.

It made the argument despite the City
previously having had an in-house airport manager and a team of staff under its
roads department which ran the airport, until it was taken over by the mayor’s,
and later, the city manager’s offices.

The CAA, which regulates aviation
in South Africa, threatened to close down the airport two years ago after four
inspections found that it was endangering the lives of those who used it.

WNA is not only supposed to be an
income stream for the municipality, but it should provide ease of access to it
for the high flyers who regularly need to travel to the capital. Tshwane is the
administrative hub of the country, housing many foreign embassies, business
headquarters and the national government.

But problems with the management
of the airport, going back to 2014, caused the CAA to threaten to shut it down.

Request for deviation

The airport also suffered a major
blow when SA Airlink suspended its Pretoria-Cape Town flights last year, citing
a lack of profitability. A group of concerned employees asked the Public
Protector to investigate the management of the airport earlier this year.

The Auditor General slapped the
City with a R5bn irregular expenditure finding in its most recent report. The
vast majority of this expenditure was because of non-compliance with
procurement processes.

A document seen by News24 shows
that on August 1, 2019, the City’s bid adjudication committee (BAC) recommended
that Professional Aviation Services (PAS) be reappointed on a month-to-month
basis for six months to manage the airport, at a monthly rate of R828 000. PAS
was first appointed in late 2017.

In a report to the BAC, the
City’s roads and transport department wrote a request to deviate from normal
procurement processes to appoint PAS. Deviations are allowed in terms of
National Treasury regulations, but only under specific circumstances, such as
in emergencies or in exceptional cases where there is no other service provider
to bid for the contract.

The report shows just how close
Tshwane came to losing its licence to operate the airport. The City Aerodrome
Licence from the CAA is valid from August 2018 to the end of July 2019.

In justifying the request to
appoint PAS on a deviation, the roads and transport department said CAA
inspections in 2017 resulted in the City receiving 89 findings of non-compliance.
Some of these could have resulted in loss of life or damage of property, the
report states.

A number of the CAA’s concerns
have now been addressed, according to the report, but the airport has still not
conducted a full-scale emergency exercise as required by law. One is scheduled
for November. CCTV systems, runway X-ray machines, and the runway lighting
systems must also be repaired.

The roads and transport
department said the airport licence would be revoked by the CAA if an airport
manager is not appointed. But an internal process to hire one could not be
finalised “due to the responses received from the market”, officials
from the department wrote.

‘Not legally in order’

An alternative appointment
process will take six months to finalise, so the BAC needed to approve the
deviation so that PAS could be appointed again, they argued. In the meantime,
the department would try to source a manager from the market or approach the
Airports Company of South Africa (ACSA) to do the job.

The BAC resolved to approve the
deviation, but not before the City’s most senior legal advisors and finance
staff put up a fight.

chief financial officer wrote that it was not clear how the amount of R828 000
would be determined.

invoice from PAS seen by News24 shows that it invoices for “service
provided in terms of letter”. No other details of the work it does are

Officials from the City’s Group
Legal and Secretariat, which includes its head of corporate legal compliance,
said the report to the BAC was “not legally in order”. They said the
request to deviate from procurement processes did not comply with the City’s
own supply chain management policy and the accompanying legal framework.

The City’s divisional head for
supply chain management wrote that a previous payment to PAS would have to be
declared irregular expenditure because the City paid them without having a
contract in place, although a contract was later signed.

The SCM department also said it
could not support the recommendation to appoint PAS on a deviation, because the
City was not following the correct policies in expanding the scope of the
contract without council approval.

But the BAC recommended the
reappointment of PAS regardless.

When asked for comment, the City
referred News24 to its explanation for this as cited in the BAC report.

THE NEWS at your fingertips and 
download the News24 app for Android here now. Get it for your iPhone here.

UPDATED on the latest news by subscribing to our FREE newsletter.

– FOLLOW News24 on Twitter

Source link


Already reacted for this post.


Nobody liked ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.